Size:
4
Pay in installments of $6.05 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 4 - Jul 9
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
modest swim dress Floral Swim DressModest Mermaid Floral Swim Dress with; Round, high neckline Contrasting, printed long sleeves SPF 50+ sun protection rating Best suited to A DD cup sizes Just below knee length Designed in Australia Quick drying Pull on style Relaxed fit If you are in between sizes it is recommended going up a size. Made from: 82% Polyamide 18% Elastane This swimsuit contains a percentage of polyamide elastane which makes it lightweight, comfortable and quick drying!
Modest Mermaid Floral Swim Dress with;
- Round, high neckline
- Contrasting, printed long sleeves
- SPF 50+ sun protection rating
- Best suited to A-DD cup sizes
- Just below knee length
- Designed in Australia
- Quick drying
- Pull-on style
- Relaxed fit
- If you are in between sizes it is recommended going up a size.
- Made from: 82% Polyamide / 18% Elastane
This swimsuit contains a percentage of polyamide/elastane which makes it lightweight, comfortable and quick-drying! Swimwear that contains polyamide is a pool-friendly option that is great for occasional pool visits. Although, it is not designed for everyday use in a chlorinated pool. If you are looking for swimwear that is 100% chlorine resistant, we recommend checking out these styles here.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 624 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Stunning
Gem Type: Topaz, Ring Size: 8
It’s really simple & elegant. I receive compliments every time I wear it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 19, 2021
★★★★★ 5
Beautiful stone
I'm in awe at how beautiful this ring is. The band is alittle thin bit it just makes that stone stand out more!!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 17, 2024
★★★★★ 5
Excellent
Gem Type: No Gemstone, Ring Size: 9
I don't usually leave reviews but this ring is gorgeous. It's weight is good. Design is beautiful. Some gold u buy can be really thin n flimsy but this ring is substantial enough. Im truly enjoying it. Will buy from them again.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 6, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Replaced wedding band after 43 years
Gem Type: No Gemstone, Ring Size: 10
I am thrilled with this ring. After 43 years, due to arthritis and aging my knuckles were too swollen for my original band. This is a very pretty, sturdy, detailed ring. I have received many compliments and I am well pleased with the quality. It was also on time, well packaged and a notice was sent of it's arrival. Very nice. Highly recommend.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 11, 2023
★★★★★ 5
Not a ring you want to do hard dirty work in. Worth taking care of
Gem Type: No Gemstone, Ring Size: 8
I had mixed feelings when I got it. It is very lite weight. Next to my other gold jewelry it looked like a different color. It is 18k tho and my others are 14k.$300. To me ain't cheap. I have wanted this ring for along time. I started to send it back. Hubby talked me into keeping it. I got a size 8 so I could wear it on my thumb or middle finger. I have arthritis in my hands so rings fitting is a challenge. Some days I can wear them, others I can't. This ring is beautiful and being lite weight is a plus when your fingers hurt. So glad I kept it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 12, 2019